Commentary: Flawed scientific-evidence standards delay diesel regulations.

نویسندگان

  • Antoinette Pusateri
  • Kristin Shrader-Frechette
چکیده

Of 188 government-monitored air toxics, diesel particulate matter (DPM) causes seven times more cancer than all the other 187 air toxics combined, including benzene, lead, and mercury. Yet, DPM is the only air toxic not regulated more stringently under the Clean Air Act, as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP). One reason is that regulators use flawed standards of scientific evidence. The article argues (1) that DPM meets all six specified evidentiary criteria, any one of which is sufficient for HAP regulation and (2) that regulators' standards of evidence for denying HAP status to DPM (no DPM unit-risk estimate, inadequate dose-response data, alleged weak mechanistic data) err logically and scientifically, set the evidence bar too high, delay regulation, and allow 21,000 avoidable DPM deaths annually in the U.S.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

State - Variable and Representativeness Errors Conceal “ Clean Diesel ” Harm : Methodologically Fallacious ACES Research

In 2015 authors of four joint US-government and auto-and-oil-industry studies, ACES, claimed to have done the first comprehensive evaluation of lifetime exposure to new-technology-diesel exhaust (NTDE-2007), so-called “clean diesel” required by US emissions standards for year-2007 and later heavy-duty trucks. ACES claimed to have found no evidence that NTDE-2007 causes lung cancer. However, sin...

متن کامل

Lean diesel technology and human health: a case study in six Brazilian metropolitan regions

OBJECTIVE Due to their toxicity, diesel emissions have been submitted to progressively more restrictive regulations in developed countries. However, in Brazil, the implementation of the Cleaner Diesel Technologies policy (Euro IV standards for vehicles produced in 2009 and low-sulfur diesel with 50 ppm of sulfur) was postponed until 2012 without a comprehensive analysis of the effect of this de...

متن کامل

A rebuttal to chiropractic radiologists' view of the 50-year-old, linear-no-threshold radiation risk model.

This discussion is in response to a letter-to-the editor in the form of a ‘Commentary’ by Bussieres, Ammendolia, Peterson, and Taylor1 concerning our original commentary: ‘On “phantom risks” associated with diagnostic ionizing radiation: evidence in support of revising radiography standards and regulations in chiropractic,2 published in the December 2005 issue of this journal. Bussieres et al.1...

متن کامل

Biased Dismissal of Epigenetic Evidence for “Clean-Diesel” Carcinogenicity and Genotoxicity

In 2012, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) named Traditional Diesel Exhaust (TDE) a “known human carcinogen”. Most western nations agreed, passing new regulations. Yet the US denies TDE is a known carcinogen, says scientific data are uncertain, and does not regulate TDE emissions of 80 percent of US-diesel vehicles. It did require post-2007, US-heavyduty-diesel vehicles to ...

متن کامل

A tale of two diesels.

Two different samples of diesel exhaust particles (DEP) have been used by toxicologists interested primarily in cancer/genotoxicity or noncancer--such as pulmonary inflammation and asthma exacerbation--health end points. These are, respectively, a standard reference material, SRM 2975, from a heavy-duty diesel engine, and a sample collected by researchers at the Japanese National Institute for ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Accountability in research

دوره 22 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015